Saturday, April 29, 2006

"UNITED 93" FLICK HOMAGE

“United 93” doesn’t feel so much like a movie as it does an event.

Perhaps this is a film that only an outsider could have made, and that's why British Writer/Director Paul Greengrass was the perfect choice for this sensitive material. The director best known for the action packed Bourne films returns to his "Sunday Bloody Sunday" roots to create one of the most stirring and intense moving going experiences of the year. IMHO, the first great film of 2006.

It wouldn’t have been hard for the filmmakers to make bad decisions: use Hollywood stars, over dramatize. Surprisingly, these filmmakers show a great deal of discipline, detail, apparent accuracy, and a point blank, gritty-truth almost-documentary style.

“United 93” isn't entertaining in any conventional sense, any more than being asked to relive your worst nightmare would be. Its utterly realistic style and unflinching re-creation of the world's most tragic morning combine for 110 minutes of nerve-wracking, edge-of-your-seat dread. It's also a respectful, carefully constructed (and, at times, conjectured) tribute to the thousands of innocent people who lost their lives on 9/11, particularly the 40 courageous passengers on doomed Flight 93.

Greengrass notes that these were the only passengers and crew members on any of those ill-fated flights who knew about the other planes having been used as weapons and realized what was happening to them. "They were the first people to inhabit the post-9/11 world," Greengrass says. These were the first to react to the worldwide conflict we find ourselves in today. Within the microcosm of that reaction, Greengrass has made an emphatic political document, a movie about defiance against tyranny and terrorism.

What makes United 93 so dramatic is that the take-off was delayed by 30 minutes giving the passengers what other terrorist targets do not have: a countdown to what will happen to them. The film, which plays out more or less in real time, is essentially divided into two parts. The first focuses on the ground management of that morning's ghastly events, jumping from various air traffic control centers, to upstate New York's Northeast Air Defense Sector, to FAA headquarters in Virginia (where real-life national operations manager Ben Sliney portrays himself as well—if not better—than any actor). The prevailing sentiment of these vérité, piano wire-taut scenes is how unprepared authorities were for such an unprecedented attack. After all, as it's eerily noted, there hadn't been a plane hijacking in some 20 years.

The movie then shifts entirely to the takeover of United flight 93 and the terrified passengers' audacious response. The four Muslim terrorists, who chillingly and repeatedly justify their heinous actions in the name of "Allah," are shown as being organized and fanatical, yet less assured than one might've imagined. Acted by a quartet of grippingly authentic unknowns, who we get to know just slightly better than any of the plane's innocent travelers, these are the ultimate movie bad guys. The passengers, played by a gallery of barely familiar faces, are the ones who become truly mobilized as they make a last-ditch effort to overpower their attackers, take charge of the hellbound plane, and save each others' lives. The last 20 minutes of the film, devoted exclusively to this desperate, heroic mayhem, contains some of the most harrowing movie moments ever. It's tough to watch, but harder to look away from, due in no small part to Barry Ackroyd's extraordinary, "you-are-there" cinematography.

I’m left wondering how the film will impact the world politically. It would’ve definitely been interesting to see the impact if it’d been released during the 2004 Presidential election. Greengrass doesn’t sentimentalize or lay blame, though the government’s complete failure to do anything substantial immediately after the Twin Towers stands out glaringly.

The film does make fleeting but pointed reference to the military's inability to reach even the vice-president to trigger the "rules of engagement" and authorize shooting down the imperiled aircraft—not an indictment, just the facts. That's Greengrass' approach throughout; he's never heavy-handed and rarely pushes any emotional buttons that haven't been repeatedly pushed over the last five years. In fact, the passengers' heartbreaking "air phone" calls home to loved ones are about as manipulative as this movie gets, which is to say, not at all.stands out in the story.

On the whole, the film is acted, directed and shot just about the best it could have been. The film is respectful of those brave passengers who stood up and fought in order to save the lives of so many others on the ground. To keep things as accurate as possible, Greengrass reportedly interviewed more than 100 family members and friends of those who perished. He hired flight attendants and commercial airline pilots to play those roles; hired several civilian and military controllers on duty on Sept. 11, including the FAA's Ben Sliney, to play themselves; culled facts from the 9/11 Commission Report; and rehearsed and shot his actors in an old Boeing 757 at England's Pinewood Studios.Even Barry Ackroyd's hand-held cinematography, John Powell's muted, anxious score and the plane set fixed to computer-controlled motion gimbals to simulate the pitch and roll of the aircraft urge the viewer to think of this as a you-are-there experience. Yet no one really knows what happened on United 93. We have evidence from phone calls made from the plane as passengers were able to give blow-by-blow accounts and say goodbye to loved ones. Greengrass gives us one of the empty seats on that flight. We are the 41st passenger.

The experience overwhelms. Time passes in weird ways. The four nervous terrorists wait seemingly forever to make their move. But jump the gun. Instead of waiting until they were closer to DC, the terrorist took over the plane too early, they realized they had to be able to hold everyone in control for 2 hrs instead of 30 minutes. The panicked passengers wait seemingly forever to make their move. Helplessness engulfs us, then determination takes hold.During these breathless moments, Greengrass cuts away to the desperation and confusion in airport control towers, the FAA's overwhelmed operations command center in Herndon, Va., and the military's unprepared operations center at the Northeast Air Defense Sector in upstate New York. For all their monitors and electronic equipment, there is a horrific, low-tech moment when controllers at Newark Airport get a perfect view across the Hudson of the second plane hitting a World Trade Center tower. No one can even speak."United 93" is a sincere attempt to pull together the known facts and guesses at the emotional truths as best anyone can. Then, in the movie's final moments, the impact of the heroism aboard United 93 becomes startlingly clear.

The news coverage on 9/11 focused on the Pentagon and World Trade Center. News of United 93 at that time was like "A plane went down in Pennsylvania, now back to New York." There were real heroes aboard that flight and now we have an idea what they went through and can honor their courage and determination.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Trek XI: It Won't Be Kirk and Spock

Woohoo! I've learned that the earlier news about Trek XI is incorrect. More details're at http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=18614

At this point Abrams still seems to be leaning towards doing a story set during the time of Kirk. It MIGHT turn out OK, but this is not taking a bold new step in the future with the Trek franchise.

Gene Roddenberry didn't always go in the right direction with Trek, but watching how Trek is being twisted about gives me food for thought regarding making one's story ideas the property of a studio whose leadership changes every few months.

Unlike Lucas, Roddenberry didn't own his own company, so Trek didn't necessarily pass into good hands after his passing. There have been some excellent people, though, like Harve Bennet, Ron Moore, and Michael Pillar. Along with some not so hot producers, who dragged Trek into the ground and ran it off the air. Berman and Braga come to mind.

As a fan with no input in Trek's direction, one can only watch how things develop over the next few years.

Being an Alias fan, I've come to notice that Abrams and his disciples don't like to let go of the past. They're constantly trying to revisit the dynamics of Seasons 1 & 2, which they destroyed in Season 3 and tried to resurrect in Season 4 only to toss it all aside again by killing/firing Michael Vartan's character, and then bring him back in the last few episodes of Alias. First they couldn't let go of Irina Derevko, now it's Michael Vaughn. What sort of plan were they following for a series that had such early potential and then declined?

I seriously question the creative decisions Abrams and company made in Alias Seasons 3-5, which is another subject.

What's relevant here is Abrams fascination with the past is showing up in his early impulse to revisit the era of Kirk and Spock.

IMHO, going into Trek's past is not the best move if the franchise is to be rebooted for a new generation of would-be Trekkers.

Monday, April 24, 2006

2006 1st QUARTER WOTF QUARTER-FINALIST

Hi all,

As noted in my "Kick Off" post, I'd submitted a short space opera SF tale "Honor and Justice" to WOTF in December 2005. I got my story back on 3-31-06 with a letter telling me that I made it to the quarter-finals.

I know this is supposed to be an achievement, but saying that I'm extremely disappointed is putting it mildly.

My rejection letter says "Honor" was in the top 10-15% of all entries. Contest judges were Anne McCaffrey, Algis Budrys, Robert Silverberg, Yoji Kondo, and K.D. Wentworth.

Judy the Contest Administrator wrote a small note saying "Send another story soon!"

I can't say this makes me feel better.

C'est le vie as le francais would say. Or nichevo if I were Russian.

Boris

Sunday, April 23, 2006

Another Trek Movie

I'm passing this along from Louis, a Trek fiction writer, who got this off an AOL board, I believe.

>>>'Star Trek' Franchise Set for Revival 2008 Film to Be Directed by Man Behind 'Lost' Reuters LOS ANGELES (April 21) - More than three years after the last "Star Trek" movie crashed at the box office, the venerable sci-fi franchiseis being revived by the director of the upcoming "Mission: Impossible" sequel, Daily Variety reported in its Friday edition.

The as-yet-untitled "Star Trek" feature, the 11th since 1979, isaiming for a fall 2008 release through Paramount Pictures, the ViacomInc. unit looking to restore its box-office luster under newmanagement, the trade paper said.

The project will be directed by J.J. Abrams, whose Tom Cruise vehicle"Mission: Impossible III" will be released by Paramount on May 5.Abrams, famed for producing the TV shows "Alias" and "Lost," will also help write and produce.

Daily Variety said the action would center on the early days of "StarTrek" characters James T. Kirk and Mr. Spock, including their firstmeeting at Starfleet Academy and first outer-space mission.

The paper described "Star Trek" as Hollywood's most durable performerafter James Bond, spawning 10 features that have grossed more than $1billion and 726 TV episodes from six series.

The 10th film, "Star Trek: Nemesis," bombed at the box office on its December 2002 release, earning just $43 million in North America. Lastyear, Viacom-owned broadcast network UPN pulled the plug on thelow-rated series "Star Trek: Enterprise" following a four-season run.>>>>

And AOL ran a simple poll. Not scientific, but still relevant, I think. Where do you stand on 'Star Trek' movies?
Make more, now82%
They are yesterday's news18%
Total Votes: 41,334

To me, the demand for more Trek is a sign that it's an enduring saga with a lot of emotional resonance to people.

It's a pity in my eyes that the studio is being conservative by revisiting the past of stock characters rather than beginning a new chapter in the Trek universe.

This movie might turn out great, BUT I'd much rather see what the Federation is like in, say, the 26th century rather than see how Kirk and Spock met for the first time.

JJ Abrams being hired to direct might or might not be a good move. Abrams is definitely talented, but he has a Jekyll and Hyde tendency to alternate brilliant work with not so good stuff. Compare Alias seasons 1 & 2 with seasons 3-5.

Also, because the release date is set 4 years from now, there's a greater chance for things to change, like Abrams quitting or being canned, and even for production to completely stop. Hollywood is like that for better or worse.

Now I really must get back to my Decatur script rewrite. Aaargh...

Boris
Online Journal of Lew Hunter's 2005 Superior Screewriting Colony

A fellow colonyite, Cash Anthony, created a journal of the above screenwriting colony held for two weeks in July 2005. Click here to go to the journal http://www.msgroup.org/msg/introducing_superior.htm

Thanks a million Cash! Her website's at http://www.msgroup.org/msg/Default_new.htm

It was a unique time that I'll never forget.

Must get back to writing, though. Especially my Decatur script rewrite.

Later

Friday, April 21, 2006



ALBATROSS SCREENWRITER QUORUM DISSOLVED

On Friday, April 21, 2006, I deleted the above screenwriting quorum. I'd started it during October 2005 when I started a screenwriting course.

I participate in a number of fiction groups, but hadn't found a screenwriter group I liked, so I tried to form my own.

Brilliant, yes. Simple...

Not counting myself, there was a peak of 16 members. I had hopes and plans to expand membership and even start in-group workshops.

Unfortunately, it wasn't to be.

Posting was sporadic at best, potential members blew me off and/or disqualified themselves, and my topic strings ended up talking to themselves.

This group was actually my second. The first group, The Quorum, was formed from among three people I met in a fiction group, who said they wanted to spend time participating in a screenwriting group.

That was only what they said.

They made the Albatross Quorum seem kickin' by comparison. My first group lasted only a month or so.

After some consideration and a small chat with a fiction acquaintance, who kindly joined without being invited, I issued a deletion notice just three days earlier to the Albatross Quorum.

Only one person responded, expressing his regrets at the group's passing.

In retrospect, I can't say I'm surprised.

In my final missive to the Albatross Quorum, I wrote something along the lines of:

subj: The Final Goodbye

The Albatross Quorum goes into the night the way it did through life.

Quietly.

No rage, rage against the dying of the light.

'Tis a pity.

-----------------------------------------------------

:-(

Nichevo. Russian term. Loosely translated as "Can't be helped," I believe.

Where one door closes, another opens. Can't wait to see what comes next.

Now I must do my latest screenwriting assignment, complete my current script rewrite, then get back to fiction and make it into a pro small fiction market whether it wants to admit me or not.

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

RETRO FLICK REVIEW: "SERENITY"


Hi Everyone,

I'd seen the film "Serenity" something like ten times in the seven weeks it was released, so I thought I'd share my reactions to it. Especially since there isn't anything in the theaters right now or coming up soon that I care to fork over some money to watch.

First off, I will say that I like SF, but I'd never watched "Firefly"when it was aired on Fox. I caught part of one episode on the SCI FI cable channel a few months ago and was hooked. Blast the Fox executives who cancelled "Firefly"!

Anyhow, in this viewer's opinion, "Serenity" displays superior characterization, dialogue, and story structure line for line and scene for scene than George Lucas' prequel Star Wars trilogy. In fact, it's one of the best-written and directed films in any category that I've seen in the last several years.

The film lives by its wits rather than CGI. Joss Whedon cobbles together elements of Westerns, space epics, zombie horror movies, and new age mysticism into a cohesive whole within the context of "Serenity." He travels a well worn chase plot with great dialogue, characterization, and wit.

"Serenity" is what "Star Wars: New Hope" would've been if Han Solo was the protagonist and there were no noble Jedi knights to give everyone inferiority complexes. Nathan Fillion aimed for and nailed the character in his portrayal of Malcolm (Mal) Reynolds, captain of the cargo ship "Serenity" and a work-for-hire crew willing to do any job.

Mal is a guy who would've shot Greedo first. In the wake of fighting for the Independents (the losing side) in a galactic civil war, Mal has lost his belief in the decency of human nature. Despite his cynicism, he cares more for other people than he lets on and is fanatically loyal to his crew, the only family he has left inthe 'verse (universe). Summer Glau, who plays River Tam, stands impressively behind Nathan Fillion as the film's second lead. She portrays with convincing angst a tortured girl with no emotional rock and carries on JossWhedon's penchant for showcasing young women with ungodly martial arts ability. Her background as a dancer put her in good stead when she trained with a Hong Kong fight choreographer, adding uncanny grace to her fight scenes.

All the Firefly characters have their moments: Simon Tam (Sean Maher) whose only concern is River's safety; Kaylee (Jewel Staite) the ship's adorable 20 something genius engineer with a torch forSimon; Shepherd Book (Ron Glass) the enigmatic preacher with a likely government past; Jayne (Adam Baldwin) mercenary muscle for hire with deeply denied feelings of affection for the rest of the crew; Wash(Alan Tudyk) the peace-loving ship's ace pilot and huband to Zoe (Gina Torres), Mal's amazon wartime buddy; and Inara (Morena Baccarin) the companion/geisha whom Mal has bears a cross for.

The film's villain, Operative (no name), played by British actor Chjwetel Ejiofor (unpronounceable :-)) very nearly steals the show. He plays the ultimate anti Darth Vader: noble, idealistic,thoughtful, and ruthless. The Reavers, cannabilistic humans, serve as the perfect foil to the Alliance, a utopian society bent on making everyone over into its mold and staying in power. Unlike most series creators, Whedon's willing to put his pet characters through the wringer. Two die before the film's end and the rest look likely to join them before things finally turn around. The dialogue sizzles, having bits of Chinese slang, character building moments, and lines from "Bonanza":

Mal (to Inara): Kaylee's been missing you sumpin' fierce.

Mal: Chicken's come home to roost.

Mal: I aim to misbehave.

Jayne: Let's be bad guys.

Operative (stabs Mal in stomach with a sword): Do you know what your sin is?
Mal (head butts bad guy): Hell, I'm a fan of all seven. (Pulls sword out of his stomach) I'd have to go with wrath right now. (Stabs at Operative who dodges and disarms him.)

By the end of the film, Mal finds new strength in having struck a blow against the Alliance's utopian agenda and River begins to find the strength in her character and her place among the crew.

Having said that "Serenity" is a trim picture of epic proportions, it was marketed horribly. TV ads were shown on the SCIFI channel for months, but on broadcast networks only the week before release. I remember seeing one theater trailer, which was a miracle in hindsight. A producer/screenwriting teacher I queried had no idea the film was coming out on its day of release. It seems the main effort was put into a grass roots campaign of showing the film to fans in periodic screenings I didn't hear of.

The cast, who are great in their roles, are unknowns and thus unable to bring in the mass of moviegoers that come with star power to offset Joss Whedon's meager marketing attempts. Hopefully, DVD sales and Whedon's clout will get Universal to greenlight more sequels to "Serenity" in the years to come.

This writer will line up to watch them.

Sunday, April 16, 2006




ODYSSEY WORKSHOP QUOTES


When I attended the Odyssey 2000 Fantasy Workshop, I was quoted twice in the crit circle by Jeanne Cavealos, the writer/editor who created the workshop and runs it magnificently.

She got me when I didn't know it: :-)

  • "With a plot, it will be that much better."
  • "The image I had of this guy was he was slender and prissy and needed to be roughed up a little."
Quotes of my workshop classmates are at http://www.sff.net/odyssey/grads00.html

An acquaintance of mine, Larry Hodges, a published short fiction comic SF/fantasy writer (http://www.larrytt.com/fantasy/) has shared some quotes with me that he's preparing for Jeanne's consumption at his upcoming Odyssey 2006 workshop.

Enjoy the read:

  • Am I the only one here who is smiling and nodding his head and has no idea what this story is about?
  • The main conflict in the story is our disagreement over whether it needs conflict.
  • If I used the same word over and over, it must have been a really good word.
  • Do the aliens wear pants?
  • Those aren’t typos, that’s creative writing.
  • I think I understand that we’re not supposed to understand the ending.
  • That’s an awful lot of words without a plot.
  • It’s a nice story, but some characters and a plot would improve it.
  • I like it when the main character dies at the start.
  • Stop trying to make me write good!
  • Do slimy aliens have to wash their clothes a lot?
  • The opening made it clear that this was a story we didn’t want to read.
  • The story had a great ending, if it had only ended at the end.
  • If I had wanted you to tell me everything instead of showing, I’d have asked.
  • I love how you resolved the climax by never getting to it.
  • That’s one of the best written stories I’ve read, but what happened?
  • I guess it’s plausible since you’ve established the characters don’t act plausibly.
  • Do all the bad guys have to die?
  • It was rather interesting, but in a boring sort of way.
  • I like the story’s title, but isn’t that false advertising?
  • I like how the story started right in the middle of the action, but will there be a sequel that explains what was going on?
  • I know it’s not plausible, but was it interesting?

Friday, April 14, 2006

"HEAVEN'S MANDATE " SCREENPLAY EXCERPT

I'm posting for the heck of it a scene from a screenplay I completed for a winter UCLA screenwriting class.

It's titled "Heaven's Mandate." Storyline: A Chinese Joan of Arc with a mystic sword sacrifices all to save her homeland and thwart a power-mad noblewoman from becoming empress of China.

Think a Chinese Joan of Arc fighting for righteousness with a magic sword or "Gladiator" & "Braveheart" going to China, where they meet "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon."

I've sent this script to a UCLA script competition. The top 5 receive a small cash reward, there are five honorable mentions, and all ten get their names and story summaries printed in film trade journals.

I entered the script to see how it fares with competition. If it places within the top ten and I get calls from agents, managers, and producers who want to see the script, I'll send it out and see what happens.

[Note: Since this posting, I received word that my script was a winner in the 2005-2006 UCLA Screenplay Competition. Woohoo! See my UCLA Screenplay Contest Win post.]

I may likely market this script with a Hong Kong studio instead because they deal in this genre more.



When reading a script, it's more like a blue print for the director who shoots the scenes and the actors who play them out. The audience will never read the script, just see the film on screen. A reader can't get into the characters' heads like in fiction. We know the characters by what they say and do. Character descriptions are a bit more general in order to give casting people a wider variety of actors to look for and are used more to give actors a sense of who the characters are.

Enjoy the excerpt:
[Note: Format not saved by blog software. :-/]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EXT. REBEL ARMY HEADQUARTERS -- DAY

The ORGANIZED CHAOS of an army cleaning up a field of battle
runs rampant: litter bearers carrying wounded, prisoners
being rounded up, regiments taking roll, etc.

IMPERIAL YELLOW DRAGON BANNERS stake out a council of war in
the storm of activity.

Chinese, Khitan, and Turkish officers in gilded lamellar
armor stand clustered around AN LUSHAN, mid 40s, who leans
over a table littered with maps and other documents.

Half Turk, half Iranian, Lushan looks every bit the seasoned
military man--

Lushan shakes the table with a clenched fist.

(Note: All dialogue is in Mandarin Chinese with English
subtitles.)

LUSHAN
How fortunate it is for Captain Wu
to be up in the mountains, else he'd
be short a head now.

A CHINESE CAPTAIN speaks up.

CHINESE CAPTAIN
Captain Wu's division held up the
advance of the entire enemy right
wing before breaking...

Lushan shoots him a withering look.

CHINESE CAPTAIN
(faster)
Surely he can be excused.

A TURKISH CAPTAIN offers his support.

TURKISH CAPTAIN
Captain Wu's action did lend us enough
time to pierce the enemy center and
rout him from the field.

LUSHAN
I suppose...

Lushan looks up as a squad of soldiers escorting Ching and
Seng approaches his council.

The women, their hair tied in topknots, wear dull-colored
tunics and breeches. Ching wears the straight-bladed jian
sword Heavenglaive strapped to her back. Seng wields a long
staff.

LUSHAN
(to sergeant)
I said I wasn't to be disturbed.
The women can entertain the officers
later.

The SERGEANT bows. His face and those of his men are bruised.

SERGEANT
(uncomfortable)
These honorable women are nuns from
Shaolin.

Everyone's attention focuses on Ching and Seng.

CHING
Our master would be displeased to
learn you delegated us to the duties
of camp followers, Governor-general
An.

Both women bow.

CHING
I am Fa Ching.

SENG
Li Seng. Please accept the service
of two humble nuns.

Lushan studies Ching with new concentration.

LUSHAN
(tightly controlled)
You are all your master sent?

SENG
(low)
Not willingly--

Ching silences Seng with a quick look.

CHING
We are volunteers.

The officers talk among themselves.

CHINESE CAPTAIN
These are the famous cudgel monks?

TURKISH CAPTAIN
Cudgel maidens, more like.

CHINESE CAPTAIN
I'm up for some swordplay.

KHITAN CAPTAIN
Why only two?

LUSHAN
I see your master has a sense of
humor. He could've simply requested
a larger temple donation by letter.
(beat)
Go back to Shaolin, little girls...
Better yet go home and find yourselves
good farmers to look after you.
You're no Monk Biancheng or
Monk Yuekong.

Lushan gestures to the squad of soldiers to lead Ching and
Seng away.

A beat as the soldiers eye each other nervously, then point
their spears and swords at the women --

Ching slashes several nearby spear points off with one swipe
of her sword. Seng covers her back.

KHITAN CAPTAIN
A tiger-demon!

CHING
No, we are Nun Ching and Nun Seng.
Would the governor-general care to
test our quality?

Lushan draws his DAO SWORD, a saber with a broad, curved
blade.

LUSHAN
I've an edge to work off.

KICK OFF


I've been meaning to create a journal for some time, whether on paper or online. Partly because my time management skills need sharpening, partly because I'm not 100% enthusiastic about blogging. I'll see how far this goes.



The things I could've recounted as I went to the various workshops I attended or worked on the different stories I've done...

I'm finally doing it now.

Better late than never as some would say.

Where to start...

At my current stage, I'm pursuing my first pro short story sales. I haven't gotten to the point where I'm dealing with novel manuscripts and contracts yet.

I've been writing fiction since 1995. I took up screenwriting in 2002.

The list of workshops I've attended include:
-Odyssey 2000
-UCLA Professional Screenwriting Program 2002-2003
-UCLA Advanced Screenwriting Program 2004-2006
-Clarion 2004
-Dean Smith's & Kristyn Rusch's Pro Fiction 2004 Master Class
-Lew Hunter's 2005 Superior Screenwriting Workshop
-Hal Croasum's Pro Screenwriting Series 2005-2006

I've placed on the second read list of Pocket Books' pro Star Trek Strange New Worlds (SNW) anthology contest in 2004 and 2005. The second read list consists of the top 400 stories from an average of 4000 submissions. 23 stories are selected for the yearly SNW anthology from a final breakdown of 40-60 stories. Those not selected are put on what's called an alternate list. There are 3 winners and 20 honorable mentions, who're all published.

I recently placed as a quarter-finalist in the first quarter of the 2006 Writers of the Future contest. My story "Honor and Justice" went far, but still fell short. Very disappointed now. I will elevate it somehow before submitting it to a pro market whether WOTF once more, Baen's Universe Magazine, Asimovs, etc.

"Honor" storyline: A young peacemaker must decide whether to stand aside as a legendary guardian pursues a quest for blood vengeance.

I would like to get into Asimovs, but Baen does specialize in military adventure fiction and I like its pay rate of 20 cents per word. I see WOTF as the most prestigious market for "Honor," though.

I've written 5 film scripts so far, three historical epics, one SF, and one romantic comedy. In my final UCLA screenwriting class this winter, I wrote an epic called "Heaven's Mandate" in which a nun from the Shaolin Temple fights to be the conscience of a warlord rebelling against the emperor of China. You can think of "Gladiator" and "Braveheart" going to China. I've entered "Heaven's Mandate" into a UCLA script competition.

If I place in the top ten, the results are published in Hollywood trade journals which agents, producers, etc. will read. What I want from this contest is to get some early industry recognition and perhaps a Hollywood agent. From what I've gathered, though, Hollywood agents devote most of their efforts on their established clients, leaving newbie writers to market their own work, but the agent still gets a percentage. An alternative is to market on my own behalf, then bring in a Hollywood entertainment lawyer to work out the contract details. I don't want to sell the script unless I can also obtain a producer's credit and be on location when the film is shot. I'm considering marketing this to the Hong Kong studios that produced "Crouching Tiger" and "Hero" rather than Hollywood, though.

On the fiction side, I'm looking to get 3-5 pro short story sales before pursuing some planned novel projects. The focus of my short fiction so far has been SNW and WOTF, which require amateur contestants. I'm getting ravenous for my first fiction sale, but I'm also trying to save my amateur status for those two contests. Interesting paradox, no? :-)

On the screenwriting side, I'm looking to establish a track record for myself by selling scripts I don't mind not getting a producer's credit on. I'm also planning on taking directing classes in the future. My focus is to first establish a track record for myself as a screenwriter in order to get some money to pay off debt and support the directing classes.

I'm currently rewriting my fourth script "Stars and Stripes Forever" in which a young navy lieutenant struggles to destroy a frigate captured by ferocious Barbary pirates before she's set loose against an infant American republic. I liked C.S. Forester's Horatio Hornblower series as a boy and I was put in a nautical mood by the films "Master and Commander" and "Pirates of the Carribbean."

"Stars and Stripes" and my romantic comedy, are the first scripts I plan on selling. The rom com is "Twice in a Lifetime" in which a widowed man and an engaged woman are seeking their perfect match.

When I finish this script rewrite, I will shift back to preparing some stories for SNW and WOTF.

Come winter 2007, I plan on writing a second SF script, my sixth overall, in which a female scientist struggles to make first contact with an alien species to avert an unjustified war launched by humanity. I'm willing to sell this script without a producer's credit. I'm also considering signing up as an alumni for a UCLA script class to provide structure and deadlines as I write, but I'm not certain I'll do that at this point.

In July 2006, I'll be attending a series of meetings in LA organized by a screenwriting mentor, Hal Croasum, to let some students of his make preliminary contacts with film studio execs. And in August 2006 I'll be metting with TV execs and attending the Grammy's thanks to Hal.

Where will things go from here?

Boris

BORIS LAYUPAN'S LUCKY ALBATROSS FICTION & FILM SITE